Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, notable options trading activity was observed today in Modine Manufacturing Co (Symbol: MOD). A total of 4,547 contracts have been traded, which translates to approximately 454,700 underlying shares. This figure represents about 55.3% of MOD’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which stands at 822,150 shares.
A particularly high volume was recorded for the $165 strike call option expiring November 21, 2025, with 1,714 contracts trading today, equating to around 171,400 underlying shares of MOD. Below is a chart illustrating MOD’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $165 strike highlighted in orange:
PureCycle Technologies Inc (Symbol: PCT) also experienced significant options trading, with a total of 14,853 contracts exchanged. This volume represents approximately 1.5 million underlying shares, or about 54.8% of PCT’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which is 2.7 million shares.
Noteworthy activity was seen for the $11 strike put option expiring November 21, 2025, where 4,928 contracts have traded today, representing roughly 492,800 underlying shares of PCT. Below is a chart showing PCT’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $11 strike highlighted in orange:
In addition, Flowers Foods, Inc. (Symbol: FLO) reported an impressive options trading volume of 21,124 contracts, which corresponds to approximately 2.1 million underlying shares. This volume accounts for about 53.7% of FLO’s average daily trading volume over the past month, which is 3.9 million shares.
A significant volume was noted for the $12.50 strike call option expiring November 21, 2025, with 17,911 contracts trading today, representing around 1.8 million underlying shares of FLO. Below is a chart depicting FLO’s trailing twelve-month trading history, with the $12.50 strike highlighted in orange:
For various available expirations for MOD options, PCT options, or FLO options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
Also see:
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
